Tuesday, June 9, 2015

CHRISTOLOGY OF THE APOSTOLIC CHURCH FATHERS

This article is excerpted from the  book "Godhead Theology" by Bishop Jerry Hayes. Look for it on Amazon.

The men to whom the torch of truth was passed, those who lived and preached in that generation after the apostles, are called the Apostolic Fathers. Their names, sounding up from the past, give courage and strength to every warrior of the Faith. When one hears of Clement of Rome, one must think of faithfulness to pastoral leadership; Ignatius of Antioch brings to mind willingness to sacrifice all, even one’s life, for the cause of Christ; the name of Polycarp brings courage in the face of adversity: for this bishop, as he was facing the fires of the martyrs death, when asked to denounce Jesus,  replied: “I have served him eighty-six years and in no way has he dwelt unjustly with me; so how can I blaspheme my King who saved me?” Then there are the writings of the Shepherd of Hermas with his Mandates to Christian living.
It is our task, at this point, to examine these men for a statement concerning their understanding of the Godhead—particularly the christology. 
Clement of Rome: Clement was the third pastor of Rome from Peter (A.D. 90-99). There’s much thought to Clement of Rome being the same person as the Clement mentioned by Paul in Philippians 4:3 (“And I entreat thee also, true yokefellow, help those women which labor with me in the gospel, with Clement also,…”).
The Modalistic views of Clement are seen in 2 Clement 1:1 cf 4:2. 1:1, “Brethren, we are so to think of Jesus Christ as of God, and as of the judge of the living and the dead;…” 4:2 “We must, therefore, keep our flesh as a temple of God. For in like manner as you were called in the flesh, you should also come to judgment in the flesh. Our one Lord Jesus Christ, who has saved us, being first a spirit, was made flesh, and so called us; even so we also shall in this flesh receive the reward.”In this passage Clement shows a parallel between Jesus and the church. Jesus is shown to have been the Spirit, before He came in the flesh; and further, that he would return as the Spirit (to inhabit His temple, i.e. the Church). It is not surprising that the Father is not mentioned here, because even among those who were not Monarchians, the thought that the Spirit of God was a separate person from Himself had not yet occurred. To Clement, when he spoke of the Spirit, he was speaking of God; also when he spoke of Jesus, he was speaking of God. Therefore, in this passage we see clearly that Clement taught that Jesus, as God, had pre-existence as the Spirit before He was incarnated, and that He returned to the Spirit and now indwells the believers as they are the “temple of God.” 

Ignatius of Antioch: (A.D. 107–8). Ignatius was Bishop of Antioch. He died the death of a martyr under the rain of Trajan. Papias, himself a disciple of John and pastor at Hierapolis in Phrygia,  Asia Minor, informs us that Ignatius sat under the teachings of Peter, Paul and Barnabas.

Because many in the oneness camp, during the 20th and 21st centuries have been too quick to paint Bishop Ignatius with the brush of trinitarianism, we will take some time and space to set the record straight here. We feel that those of Pentecostal evangelicalism have flenched from Ignatius because of his highly developed ecclesiastical theology. This has been a serious mistake in our view. The bishop of Antioch was a champion of the Apostolic Faith and to surrender him to the camp of the pluralist has been done to our hurt. Virginia Corwin, who did her Ph.D  dissertation at Yale on Ignatius, stated: “If one term must be chosen to indicate the tendency of his thought, Ignatius must be said to be Monarchian.”

Virginia Corwin was born in Orange, New Jersey, on August 17, 1901, She graduated from Wellesley College in 1923 and received the B.D. from Union Theological Seminary in New York City in 1929; at Union she was a Kent Fellow. In 1930 she came to Smith College as an Instructor of Religion and Biblical Literature. Prof. Corwin entered Yale University in 1932 and received her Ph.D. from it in 1937. Her dissertation was on St. Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch; Yale University Press published a revision of the text in 1960. Prof. Corwin taught at Smith until 1939 when she went to Western Reserve University as Harkness Professor of Biblical Literature and acting head of the Department of Religion. In 1942 Miss Corwin returned to Smith College as an Associate Professor of Religion and was made Professor of Religion in 1953. She retired from Smith College in 1966. After Prof. Corwin retirement she was visiting professor at Claremont College in California and at Wells College in New York.

The Modalistic views of Ignatius are seen in Magnesians 7:2, ”Everyone hasten to come together to one temple of God, to one altar, to one Jesus Christ, who came forth from the one Father, abiding in the one, and returning to the one.” His Modalism is especially evident in his letter to Polycarp (Bishop Of Smyrna, with whom he shared the same faith), where he expounded on the modal aspect of the existence of God: Polycarp 1:15, “… and expect Him, who is above all time, eternal, invisible, though for our sakes made visible; impalpable, and impassable, yet for us subject to sufferings; enduring all manner of ways for our salvation.” For this statement, Ignatius would have been branded as a Patripassian (one who teaches that the Father suffered) by Tertullian and anathematized by those of the logos-christology.
Ignatius’ Godhead Theology 
In the writings of Ignatius, Christ is the central figure; He is the bishop’s all and all. No less that 14 times Ignatius calls Jesus God (Eph. inscr. 1.1, 7.2, 15.3, 17.2, 18.2, 19.3; Trall. 7.1; Rom. inscr. 3.3, 6.3; Smyrn. 1.1; Polyc. 8.3). 
The bishop lets us know that there is but one God, whom he identifies as the Father (Magnesians 8:2). This one God the Father has made Himself known to the world through and by Jesus Christ His Son. Ignatius identifies the Son as the “Word” of the Father that proceed forth from silence. He writes it this way: “… there is one God who manifested Himself through Jesus Christ His Son, who is His Word that proceeded from silence,…” (Magnesians 8:2). This is but an echo of 1 Corinthians 8:6 were Paul writes, “But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.” Ignatius agrees with John (John 1:1, 14) that the preexistent Christ was the Word of God. Ignatius calls Jesus the “thought” of God (Ephesians 3:2). J. N. D. Kelly observes, as does this author, that, for Ignatius the divine Son of God dates only from God’s incarnation into Mary’s baby. The bishop writes of it this way: “…  and firmly grounded in love in the blood of Christ, fully persuaded as touching our Lord that He is truly of the race of David according to the flesh, but Son of God by the Divine will and power, …” The preexistent Christ, then, dwelt with the Father as the mind or thought of the Father and not as a separate individual from Him, in Ignatius’ thinking.. This is what Ignatius meant when he wrote: “… Jesus Christ, who was with the Father before the worlds and appeared at the end of time” (Magnesians 6:1). When Ignatius wrote that the “Word … proceeded from silence” he was stating what the Apologists after him would confirm. Athenagoras would write in A.D. 177 that the Son was God’s “Word” proceeding from God’s “thought.”
According to this concept God is God, alone, without any companions, and when God had a thought it was His “Word” or “Son” because it was His offspring. He “birthed” a thought, a word. There is no separate ‘person’ here; only the thought or word of the One eternal person of God.  This Word/Son of God that is His mind/thought can be said to be eternal and “with” God in the beginning, because God is a sentient-being who does not exist without thought or mind. Therefore, Ignatius writes that Jesus is God’s Word from silence. Kelly writes: “Christ is the Fathers ‘thought’ (gnōmē), the unlying mouth by which the Father spoke truly” (Ephesians 3:2; Romans 8:2). Ignatius even declares that Jesus is “our God” (Ephesians inscr. 18:2; Trallians 7:1; Romans inscr.), describing Him as “God incarnate” ( Ephesians 7:2; 19:3) (en sari genomenos theos) and “God made manifest as man” (theou anthrōpinōs phaneroumenou). He was “in spirit (penumatikōs) united with the Father” (Smyrna 3:3). “… He was the timeless, invisible, impalpable, impassable one who for our sakes entered time and became visible, palpable and passable” (Ephesians 7:2; Polycarp 3:2).
Further, according to F. Loofs,
 Ignatius regarded God “as an undifferentiated monad in His essential being, the Son and the Spirit being merely forms or MODES of the Father’s self-revelation” (F. Loofs as referenced by JND Kelly; emphasis on “MODES” mine) .
There is nothing in Ignatius even coming close to a Trinitarian dogma. The monotheism of the prophets and apostles is adhered to at every turn. If any label is to be placed on the bishop of Syria it must be that of Modalistic Monarchianism. The Modalism of Ignatius can easily be demonstrated in the following way:
  1. Ignatius acknowledges that the one God is the Father (Magnesians 8:2 cf 1 Corinthians 8:6): Mag. 8:2 “...there is one God who manifested Himself through Jesus Christ His Son, ..”
  2. Jesus is the one God incarnated in human form (Ephesians 7:2; 19:3 cf Isaiah 9:6; Matthew 1:23; John 1:1-3, 14): Eph. 7:2 “There is one only physician, of flesh and of spirit, generate and ingenerate, God in man, true Life in death, Son of Mary and Son of God, first passible and then impassible, Jesus Christ our Lord.”
  1. The Holy Spirit is, in fact, Jesus Christ (Magnesians 15:1 cf Matthew 3:11; John 14:17-18; Ephesians (NT) 4:5; John 7:29; 1 Corinthians 12:13; 2 Corinthians 3:17): Mag. 15:1 “... The rest of the Churches, in honour of Jesus Christ, also salute you. Fare ye well in the harmony of God, ye who have obtained the inseparable Spirit, who is Jesus Christ.”
  2. The Holy Spirit is, in fact, the Father of the Son (Ephesians 18:2 cf Luke 1:35; Matthew 1:18): Eph. 18:2 “For our God, Jesus Christ, was concieved by Mary according to God’s plan, both from the seed of David and from the Holy Spirit. ...”
  1. Ignatius teaches the dual nature of Christ by drawing a sharp distinction between His deity and His humanity (Ephesians 7:2; 18:2; 20:2; Smyræans 1:1; Smyræans 3:3; Polycarp 3:2 cf Isaiah 9:6; Acts 2:30; Romans 1:3-4; 9:5): Eph. 7:2 “There is one Physician who is possessed both of flesh and spirit; both made and not made; God existing in flesh; true life in death; both of Mary and of God; first passible and then impassible, even Jesus Christ our Lord.” 18:2 “For our God, Jesus Christ, was conceived by Mary according to God’s plan, both from the seed of David and from the Holy Spirit. ...” 20:2 “... in Jesus Christ, who was of the seed of David according to the flesh, being both the Son of man and the Son of God, ...” Smyr. 1:1 “...established in love through the blood of Christ, being fully persuaded with respect to our Lord, that He was truly of the seed of David according to the flesh, and the Son of God according to the will and power of God;...” 3:3 “And after his resurrection He did eat and drink with them, as being possessed of flesh, although spiritually He was united to the Father.” Poly. 3:2 “Look for Him who is above all time, eternal and invisible, yet who became visible for our sakes; impalpable and impassible, yet who became passible on our account; and who in every kind of way suffered for our sakes.”
  2. When a distinction is made between Jesus and the Father the bishop qualifies it by emphasizing the humanity of Christ (Magnesians 13:2 cf 1 Timothy 2:5):  Mag. 13:2 “Be obedient to the bishop and to one another, as Jesus Christ was to the Father [according to the flesh], ...”
  3. The Modalistic views of Ignatius are seen in Magnesians 7:2, ”Everyone hasten to come together to one temple of God, to one altar, to one Jesus Christ, who came forth from the one Father, abiding in the one, and returning to the one.” His Modalism is especially evident in his letter to Polycarp (Bishop Of Smyrna, with whom he shared the same faith), where he expounded on the modal aspect of the existence of God: Polycarp 1:15, “… and expect Him, who is above all time, eternal, invisible, though for our sakes made visible; impalpable, and impassable, yet for us subject to sufferings; enduring all manner of ways for our salvation.” For this statement, Ignatius would have been branded as a Patripassian (one who teaches that the Father suffered) by Tertullian and anathematized by the those of the logos-christology.
Ignatius writes of the triad of Father, Son and Holy Spirit within the Godhead often. It is clear that he sees this triad as the economy of the deity, and not as a trinity of individuals. This is presented as colorfully as a picture of words can paint, in his letter to the Ephesians 9:1, 
“…ye are stones of a temple, which were prepared beforehand for a building of God the Father, being hoisted up to the heights through the engine of Jesus Christ, which is the Cross, and using for a rope the Holy Spirit; while your faith is your windlass, and love is the way that leadeth up to God.”
With this allegory, Bishop Ignatius portrays the economy of God working to facilitate the salvation of fallen man, and restore him to relationship with God. This is accomplished through the cross of the Son of God and the strength and power of the Holy Spirit of God, both of which are self-revelations of the Father necessary to build His building—the Church. The apostle Paul writes of God’s economy this way: “The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the com-munion of the Holy Ghost, be with you all. Amen” (2 Cor 13:14)

Hermas: the Shepherd of Hermas seems to have been written in Rome between A.D. 100-150. Hermas is thought to have been the brother of Pius, the Bishop of Rome at the time. According to contemporary Oneness Pentecostal historian, William Chalfant, Pius was a Modalist; this would hold to reason since the person who many supposed to have been his brother (namely Hermas) portrays strong Modalist views in his writings. In the following passage the Shepherd of Hermas identifies the Holy Spirit with Christ, and as the Creator: “The preexistent Holy Spirit, which created all creation, God caused to dwell in the flesh which he wished.” According to the Shepherd of Hermas, it was the Holy Spirit that was incarnated in Jesus. Then he proceeds to speak of the flesh of Christ in a submissive role – showing the dual nature: “So this flesh, in which the Holy Spirit dwelled, served the Spirit well, living in reverence and purity, and did not defiled the Spirit in any way.” (Shepherd of Hermas 59:5)

Apostolically Speaking
Mar David Ignatius



If the ministry of the Bishop is a blessing to you, please consider leaving a monetary gift of any amount at the link provided here:
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=4EXSWA2A47ARC









View this video on The Christology of the Church Fathers






Excerpted from the author's book entitled "Godhead Theology." Published by Seven Millennium Publications. Order your personal copy today: https://www.amazon.com/Godhead-Theology-Modalism-Original-Orthodoxy/dp/1516983521/ref=sr_1_fkmrnull_1?keywords=Godhead+theology%2C+Hayes&qid=1554054212&s=books&sr=1-1-fkmrnull






Apostolically Speaking
☩☩ Jerry L Hayes
(Mar David Ignatius)

Read other essays from the Bishop on the subject of the Godhead:

"The Dual Nature Of Jesus Of Nazareth"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-dual-nature-of-jesus-of-nazareth.html

"The Worlds, Made By The Son"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-worlds-made-by-son.html

"Hebrews 13:8 vs 1 Corinthians 15:28"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2012/12/hebrews-138-vs-1-corinthians-1528.html

"Glory With The Father"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2012/12/glory-with-father.html

"Philippians 2:6-8, Answering Trinitarian Objections"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2013/02/philippains-26-8-answering-trinitarian.html

"How Is God One?"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2013/02/how-is-god-one.html

"Hebrew Monotheism"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2013/02/hebrew-monothesim.html

"Answering Trinitarian Objections To The Oneness Faith"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2013/03/answering-trinitarian-objections-to.html


"The Apostolic Creed"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2013/05/i-believe-in-one-god-1-solitary-in.html

"Jesus Is Father God"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2013/07/jesus-is-father-god.html

"Homoousia And The Creed Of Nicaea"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2013/10/homoousia-and-creed-of-nicaea.html

"The Triquetra And Modalism"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2013/12/triquetra-and-modalism.html

"Modalism, Simultaneous Or Sequential?"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2014/01/modalism-biblical-and-historical.html

"Micah 5:2-4, An Exegesis"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2014/02/micah-52-4-exegesis-but-thou-bethlehem.html


"Elohim, the Plural form For God"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2014/10/answering-trinitarian-objections-to.html

"Can the Deity of Jesus Be called The Son Of God?"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/04/can-deity-of-jesus-be-called-son-of-god.html

"Mathematical Equation For The Godhead"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/04/mathematical-equation-of-godhead-1x1x11.html

"Hebrew Monotheism, Second Edition"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/05/hebrew-monotheism.html

"Jesus, On God's Right Hand"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/05/jesus-on-gods-right-hand.html

"The Name of the Deity" (The Tetragrammaton)
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-name-of-deity-tetragrammaton.html

"Christian Modalism challenged by the Greeks"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/06/christian-modalism-challenged-by-greeks.html

"The Apologists and the Logos Christology"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/06/the-apologist-and-logos-christology.html

"Logos Christology"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/06/logos-christology.html

"The Seven Spirits of God"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/07/revelation-14-apostolically-speaking.html

"Historical Numerical Superiority of the Monarchians"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/07/the-historical-numerical-superiority-of.html

"How Is God One?" Second Edition
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/07/how-is-god-one.html

"Creed of Nicæa (Creed of the 318) Affirmed"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/09/creed-of-nica-creed-of-318-affirmed.html

"Another Comforter (Answering Objections to Modalism)"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/09/another-comforter-answering-objections.html

"Echad vs Yachid (Answering Objections to Modalism)"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/09/echad-vs-yachid-answering-objections-to.html

"The Godhead Teaching of Ignatius of Antioch"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/10/godhead-theology-of-bishop-ignatius-of.html

"Hebrews 1:8, (Answering Objections to Modalism)"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2015/10/godhead-theology-of-bishop-ignatius-of.html

"Godhead Theology of the Tabernacle of Moses"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2016/08/godhead-theology-of-tabernacle-of-moses_5.html

"Proper Biblical Understanding of the Word 'Person'"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2017/04/proper-biblical-understanding-of-word.html

"Defense of Isaiah 9:6, Answering Objections to Modalism"
https://bishopjerrylhayes.blogspot.com/2017/04/defense-of-isaiah-96.html

Defense of 1 Timothy 3:16 (Answering Objections to Modalism)


Godhead Theology is a study of Christian Godhead theology. ... Was He God or not? In Godhead Theology Bishop Jerry Hayes follows that debate through the first 300 years of the Church's history. Our book is in five sections: Section One ... demonstrates Modalistic Monarchianism as the original orthodoxy of the Chruch; Section Two introduces the Apostolic Creed ... ; Section Three is an affirmation of Modalistic Monarchianism; Section Four is Modalism's responses to objection from the pluralists Trinitarians, Binitarians, Arians and Semi-Arians. Included are two comprehensive indexes: Subject Index and Scripture Index. 613 pages.

Own this classic book today by ordering from the link provided here:
https://www.amazon.com/Godhead-Theology-Modalism-Original-Orthodoxy/dp/1516983521/ref=sr_1_4?keywords=Bishop+Jerry+hayes&qid=1554244653&s=books&sr=1-4





THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT BY
PURCHASING OUR BOOKS FOR YOUR LIBRARY




Be sure to listen and subscribe to the Bishop's Podcast: Apostolic Bishop, at:


8 comments:

  1. I'm going to purchase the book by brother Hayes, "The Godhead Theology, Modalism, The Original Orthodoxy" when we fly back to the States. I'm looking for the exact quotes and the sources from Church Historian J. N. D. Kelly, as I'm currently searching for Trinitarian Church Historians who admit the Modalistic tendencies of Ignatius. I'm going to make a professional YouTube Video proving Ignatius was a Modalist.
    I did extensive research on The Shepherd of Hermas and found internal and external historical evidence proving that Hermas was the first century contemporary of Clement in Rome. Hermas even wrote that some of "the apostles" were "still alive" when he wrote the Shepherd. Just type in The Theology of Hermas
    on YouTube or visit my website at ApostolicChristianFaith.com - Look under our VIDEO Page and scroll down to CHURCH HISTORY.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please contact me at the following email: disciplesoftheway@yahoo.com.

      Delete
  2. I'm going to be ordering The Godhead Theology" book via Amazon so it is ready for me to read when we fly into New York in late October. Bishop Hayes is a very talented Apologist for the Oneness Apostolic Faith.
    I would like to ask Bishop Hayes if he has any materials that he would like to contribute on our Global Impact Ministry website at ApostolicChristianFaith.com We would like to post some of his articles on our website and post links to some of his YouTube videos as our Featured Weekly Sermons or Videos.
    Furthermore, I was wondering if Bishop Hayes would permit us to have a copy of his new book in computer format so we could translate it into every major language of the world. We currently have all of my books and articles translated into Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Spanish, and we are almost done with French.
    Since quite a few brethren have asked for "hard copies" of my online books, I have been putting together my materials into a single book which will also be sold on Amazon. The new book is "A Defense of Oneness Theology - According to Scripture and History." I currently have more than 350 pages put together for this book. I have several debates with Trinitarians posted on YouTube. Just type in Oneness vs. Trinity on YouTube. God bless our beloved brother, Bishop Hayes!
    In Christ's Love,
    Brother Steve Ritchie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please contact me at the following email: disciplesoftheway@yahoo.com.

      Delete
  3. Brother Ritchie
    Please contact me at the following email: disciplesoftheway@yahoo.com.

    ReplyDelete
  4. People are converting to the Oneness Apostolic gospel all over the world through my online video debates and teaching. I know that the Spirit placed it within my heart to have a Global Impact Ministry which is why I named it thus. I happened to find church historian Jaraslov Pelikan's comment about modalists signing the Nicene Creed of 325 while preparing for my debate with RC apologist William Albrecht. It was good to find some historical corroboration from you as a seasoned Oneness Apostolic theologian and apologist. I will contact you via your email address. In His Love, Brother Ritchie.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You are incorrect.

    Roman Montero's collection of quotations
    from ante-Nicene Church Fathers
    & their (non-)orthodoxy /

    Ρόμαν Μοντέρο:
    Η συλλογή αποσπασμάτων
    προνικαϊκών εκκλησιαστικών πατέρων
    & η (αν-)ορθοδοξία τους

    https://e-homoreligiosus.blogspot.com/2021/05/roman-monteros-collection-of-quotations.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. Clement of Rome and the Trinity Doctrine, by Alvan Lamson 1865


    http://newworldtranslation.blogspot.com/2018/03/clement-of-rome-and-trinity-doctrine-by.html?m=1

    ReplyDelete