Thursday, April 9, 2020

Revelation 2:10; Commentary

2:10 “Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life.”

“Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer:” Fifteen times the New Testament says “fear not” (or similar words), nine of these times they were the words of Christ, Himself. It is not often someone will tell you not to fear, and in the same sentence assure you of suffering. The very words, “Fear none of those things,” would be comforting to most anyone, if the person was assured that “those things” would not harm him or her. But that’s not the case here. It is not the case, so much of the time, with God’s children. For the saints of Smyrna “those things” were very real and, what is more, Christ assured them, by His words, that these very real dangers would, indeed, cause them very real harm. Notice, he said “which thou shalt suffer.” Not “may suffer,” but “shalt suffer.” It is a foregone conclusion, Jesus is saying, “You are about to suffer.” But He prefaced this hard truth with “mēden phobou” — “Not at all fear.” This strange manner of speaking is also seen in His Sermon on the Mount. Matthew, Mark, and Luke give an account of the same discourse. Matthew in ch 24 of his gospel, Mark in chapter 13, and Luke in his ch 21. When these three accounts are considered, and juxtaposed to each other, it is evident that they are accounts of the same discourse reported from three different sources. We will show these accounts because it is important to see how that after Jesus informed His followers of coming affliction, death, prison, betrayal, and the animosity of the world, Luke would record the extraordinary statement of Christ as he said, 
“But there shall not a hair of your head perish. 19 In your patience possess ye your souls.” (Luke 21:18-19)

Matthew 24 :7-14“...and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. 8 All these are the beginning of sorrows. 9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake. 10 And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another. 11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. 12 And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold. 13 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved. 14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.” 

Mark  13:9-13“But take heed to yourselves: for they shall deliver you up to councils; and in the synagogues ye shall be beaten: and ye shall be brought before rulers and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them. 10 And the gospel must first be published among all nations.11 But when they shall lead you, and deliver you up, take no thought beforehand what ye shall speak, neither do ye premeditate: ... 12 Now the brother shall betray the brother to death, and the father the son; and children shall rise up against their parents, and shall cause them to be put to death. 13 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: ... .” 

Luke 21:12-18 “...and persecute you, delivering you up to the synagogues, and into prisons, being brought before kings and rulers for my name's sake. 13 And it shall turn to you for a testimony. 14 Settle it therefore in your hearts, not to meditate before what ye shall answer:15 For I will give you a mouth and wisdom, which all your adversaries shall not be able to gainsay nor resist. 16 And ye shall be betrayed both by parents, and brethren, and kinsfolks, and friends; and some of you shall they cause to be put to death. 17 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake. 18 But there shall not an hair of your head perish.”

Is it not extraordinary, indeed, to say “But there shall not a hair of your head perish;” after just saying that they would be delivered up to be afflicted and would be killed (Matt 24)? Mark’s account says that they would be beaten in the synagogue (Mark 13), and speaks of sibling and filial betrayal unto death. Even Luke, who records the  “But there shall not a hair of your head perish” (Luke 21:18) statement, in Luke 21:16 has Jesus saying, “And ye shall be betrayed both by parents, and brethren, and kinsfolks, and friends; and some of you shall they cause to be put to death.” Yet, “… there shall not a hair of your head perish.” Extraordinary!

But there shall not a hair of your head perish.” (Luke 21:18)
We turn back now from the Sermon on the Mount to the church in Smyrna, who received the same assurance, i.e. “fear none of those things.” The truth is definite. Physical harm may come, indeed, has come, and will, yet, come upon the people of God. But, because of the resurrection, and the guarantee of eternal life, no real hurt will be experienced. The Christian is instructed not to fear persecution, even if it leads to physical death, for the body is not the real person. The soul of every Christian is beyond the reach of harm, in that it is secure in Christ. Even physical death is momentary for the Christian. Death is not the period that concludes the statement of life, but, rather, a comma—a momentary pause, in, not even, mid-sentence. After which, that which has returned to dust will be reconstitute, “... corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, ...” (1 Cor 15:54). Job said it this way: “And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God” (Job 19:26). So it is, dear disciple: In that great getting up morning (John 5:29), when all has been restored incorruptible, the word of Jesus will prove sure –“there shall not a hair of your head perish.” And, therefore, the disciples of Smyrna (the Smyrna of then and now) may very well be encouraged. It is the Christian, alone, who lives the life others only speak of in slogans – “No Fear!” For death, the origin of all consternations, “... is swallowed up in victory.”(1 Cor 15:54).

“... behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison.” The “devil shall cast some of you into prison, ... .”   The devil (Grk: diabolos—Strong’s #G1228) designated the slanderer, calumniator, and false accuser, no doubt manifesting himself in the person of the Jews—falsely, so-called. We would mark well, at this point, the tenacity shown by the Jews in accusing the Lord’s apostles, and, indeed, the Lord, Himself. Thusly, showing the nature of Satan, the devil (as illustrated in 12:10, where he is called “the accuser of our brethren”), as being incarnated in the unbelieving Jews.

Beginning with the trials of Jesus (before, first Annas, then Caiaphas, then Pilate, then Herod, and finally Pilate again), and continuing throughout the New Testament period, the Jews manifested themselves as the chief slanderers of Christ and His followers. Showing themselves specially adapted to collusion and calumniation. So much so, that this propensity to prevaricate, in order to defame, malign and traduce the Holy, earned them (the Jews) the epithet, The Synagogue of Satan, translated – “The Synagogue Of the Accuser;” and here, in our text, “the devil,” translated – “the Calumniator” i.e. the “False Witness.”

Upon the arrest of Christ, Caiaphas, the chief priests, elders, and the whole counsel sought false witnesses against Jesus (Matt 26:59). There was no lack of alacrity with the Jews to calumniate. The only problem for Caiaphas was finding at least two accusers (devils—diaboloi) whose testimony was, at least, believable. At long last two were found (Matt 26:60). The accusation was a misrepresentation of the Savior’s teaching:
“And said, This fellow said, I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days.” (Matt 26:61)
No doubt they were misreporting the event recorded by John the Apostle,
“Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these things? 19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. 20 Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? 21 But he spake of the temple of his body.” (John 2:18-21)

The accuser is crafty, he will lay his lie down as close to the truth as is possible, so that at first sight it appears true. The accuser is a master of disguise and misdirection. His first acts of deception upon the human family established his modus operandi. His lie, “ye shall not surely die” (Gen 3:4) almost sounds like the truth, “thou shalt surely die”(Gen 2:17) – almost. His M. O. is always the same. So it was with Caiaphas’ lie that sounded true. It got the death penalty from the Council. Then they covered his face with their spit (Mark 14:65). 

From Caiaphas, He was brought before Pilate; where, again, “the chief priests accused him of many things:” (Matt 15:3). From Pilate to Herod where “the chief priests and scribes stood and vehemently accused him” (Luke 23:10). And finally, back to Pilate, where three times the governor tried to set Him free, and three times the voices of the high priests and scribes, with the mob, called for His crucifixion.

Nor, was this collusion of malice any kind of appeasement to their perniciousness, which turned to a kind of malignancy for the unbelieving segment of the race. However, none of this was outside of God’s purpose, for Jesus had surely said,
“Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. 32 Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. 33 Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? 34 Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city: 35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar. 36 Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation. 37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! 38 Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.” (Matt 23:31-38)

The very words of Christ manifested themselves in the deeds of the unbelieving Jews. We are careful to distinguish between the believing and unbelieving of this race. It was those who “chose” not to accept the Messiah, that are revealed in the Revelation as the “Synagogue of Satan,” and “the devil.” The malignancy of malice, toward everything messianic, spread, as pandemic, from unbelieving Jew to unbelieving Jew, to bring about the desolation of their house, i.e. the economy of Judaism. Read again Jesus’ words above (Matt 23:31-38). Just as criminals are identified by their modus operandi, so is the devil.

We look, next, to the events surrounding the martyrdom of our brother Stephen, as recorded in Acts ch’s 6 and 7. Luke informs us that it was those “of the synagogue of the Libertines, and Cyrenians, and Alexandrians, and of them of Cilicia and of Asia” (Acts 6:9) who suborned men (i.e. to induce secretly to commit perjury)—sounds familiar already—which said, 
“This man ceaseth not to speak blasphemous words against this holy place, and the law: For we have heard him say, that this Jesus of Nazareth shall destroy this place, and shall change the customs which Moses delivered us” (Acts 6:13-14).

The mode of operation was the same as with Christ. The accusation was even the same, in many respects. The outcome? It was the same as well, 
“And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit. And he kneeled down, and cried with a loud voice, Lord, lay not this sin to their charge. And when he had said this, he fell asleep.”(Acts 7:59-60 compared to Luke 23:34, 46)

Luke was kinder, when identifying these Jews, than was the Lord when identifying the accusers of the Samaritan Christians. Luke may have been a little politicly correct, when he named the synagogues they represented. Jesus, on the other hand, plainly identifies them of The Synagogue of Satan. And when Christ spoke of those who will cast the believers into prison, He, without apology, identifies them as the “devil:” (see John 8:44).

Remaining true to character, the resoluteness seen in the unbelieving Jews, to accuse and persecute the apostle Paul, is nothing short of amazing. This trail of persecution is easily traced, beginning during his first missionary journey to Antioch of Pisidia (Acts 13:45, 50), and continuing to Paul’s arrest in the temple at Jerusalem (Acts 21:27-22:30), his trial before Felix in Caesarea (Acts 24:1ff), and before Festus and Agrippa two years later at the same place (Acts 25:1-7). Through their collusions they drove Paul to Rome to appeal before Caesar; where, after a period of time (most likely released and re-arrested), Paul was beheaded. Beheading was the form of execution employed by the Jews on those found guilty of propagating un-Orthodox religious teaching. This is seen in the martyrdom of James, the brother of John, A.D. 40 (Acts 12:2), by Herod Agrippa I, the nephew of Herod Antipas, who had beheaded John the Baptist (Matt 14:3-12). It was also used by the old Roman Republic. In that, according to available sources, Paul was thusly killed, one is made to ponder a possible connection. For although he was beheaded by the Romans in A.D. 68, that form of execution was not in vogue among the Romans at the time, being the time of the Empire and not of the Republic. However, it was, indeed, still in fashion with the Jews. So, one is led to suspect Jewish influence in Paul’s execution.

... and ye shall have tribulation ten days:” The Smyrna church is informed of “tribulation ten days.” To their present trouble they were to brace themselves for “ten days” of further tribulation. In the apocalyptic manner of interpretation, we are to understand “ten days” to be ten years. When the angel Gabriel gave Daniel the vision of the 70 Weeks (Dan 9:20-27), it is understood that weeks of years are intended. Therefore, one day would be equal to one year. Applying this key for interpreting prophetic days, we may be reasonably safe in judging Smyrna’s coming “ten days” of tribulation to be actually a ten year duration.

During the reign of Emperor Domitian (A.D. 81 to 96) the Roman world saw years of tyrannical persecution of Christians. Although some modern historians have tried to give his name some relief from history, they have not been very successful, due to the fact that the ancients wrote so effectively against him; i.e. Tacitus, Martial, the Younger Pliny, and Suetonius. When he died the Roman Senate damned his memory, as it had done with Nero. Many early Christians considered Domitian as a revivification of Nero; thereby, fulfilling the prophecy of the deadly wound of the anti-Christ being healed (13:3). Domitian sought to establish autocratic power. During the first eight years of his reign, he appointed himself consul every year. While the custom of Rome was to deify an emperor after his death, Domitian declared himself a god while still living, and demanded that everyone throughout the empire offer sacrifice to him, on penalty of death. Because Smyrna was so closely tied to the cult of Roma, the likelihood of persecution, on those who refused to worship Domitian as a god, would have been greater than in other cities and providences more remote.

In that most are agreed that this “ten days” of tribulation references the ten years of persecution brought on by the emperor worship of Domitian, it seems most would also agree that such an understanding would establish an early date for the writing of the Revelation, i.e. before the reign of Domitian. If the Revelation is considered prophecy of coming events, and not just the reporting of past events in futuristic terms (which would be deceptive and misleading to future generations, and unworthy of holy Scripture), then one is forced, it seems, to admit to a writing of the Revelation before the reign of Domitian (A.D. 81).

“... be thou faithful unto death, ...” The call for faithfulness “unto death” is keeping true with the tone of this whole letter to the Smyrna church. The things “which thou shalt suffer” spoken of in the first part of the verse is here stated clearly–death. But they had also been told to “fear none of these things.” Those who have died-out to the world, and have been born from death to life, have already become a partaker of the “first resurrection;” see John 5:24-25 cf. Revelation 20:4-5, where we are told that death has no power on such ones. The grave is only a portal through which believers pass to receive their “crown of life” which awaits on the other side.

“... and I will give thee a crown of life.” The “crown of life” promised, here, to those who were “faithful unto death,” is spoken of by James, “Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him.” (James 1:12); and Paul, to the Corinthians, calls it an “incorruptible” crown, “And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible” (1 Cor 9:25); then, to Timothy the crown is spoken of as a “... crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing” (2 Tim 4:8). Further, Peter writes of the believers crown by saying, “And when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away.” (1 Pet 5:4)

Some see, here, four separate crowns that the disciple stands to receive. We think it better to view the terms life, incorruptible, righteousness, and glory as adjectival to the noun—crown. The exception to this, however, is the “crown of rejoicing” spoken of by Paul to the Thessalonians (1 Thess 2:19). Concerning this crown, Paul is referencing the Thessalonians, themselves, as his badge of reward at the coming of Christ:
“For what is our (the apostles’) hope, or joy, or crown of rejoicing? Are not even ye in the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ at his coming (parousia)?” (1 Thess 2:19; parentheses mine)

The Grk word for “crown” (used for the “crown of life” promised to the saints of Smyrna) is “stephanos.” Two words are used for crown in the New Testament: “stephanos” (Strong’s #G4735), and “diadēma” (Strong’s #G1238). There is some debate as to whether, or not, these two words are used interchangeably, or if they are use to indicate two types of crowns. “Stephanos,” the word used here (and indeed throughout the New Testament) for the crown of the believers, designates a twined wreath: a chaplet (a badge of royalty, a prize in the public games or a symbol of honor generally, but more conspicuous and elaborate than the simple fillet). “Diadēma,” used also for crown in the New Testament is a “diadem” (as bound about the head): crown (Strong’s #G1238). 

In the Septuagint “stephanos” is used to indicate a mark of royalty, or (in general) exalted rank. This is seen in the Septuagint’s rendering of 2 Sam 12:30; 1 Chr 20:2; Ps 20:4; 21:4; Ezek 21:26; Zech 6:11,14. In the Revelation we noticed that “stephanos” is used each time the saints of God are in view. Moreover, “stephanos” is also applied to Christ in 6:2 and 14:14, and also to the Woman Clothed in the Sun, 12:1.

Diadēma,” however, seems to have a more restricted use in the Revelation where it is used only for Christ at 19:12; and for the Great Red Dragon, i.e. Satan, at 12:3; and the seven headed beast at 13:1; but, never for the crowns of the saints.

The message we may gather from this usage is that “diadēma,” as used in the Apocalypse, designated an earthly rule only; while “stephanos” speaks of earthly conquest—plus heavenly reward. It should be mentioned here that the Grk scholar Joseph Henry Thayer states concerning “stephanos:” “… a mark of royalty, or… exalted rank…; Matt 27:29; Mark 15:17; John 19:2, 5; Rev 4:4, 10; 6:2; 9:7; 14:14…; The wreath or garland which was given as a prize to [those] victorious in the public games…: 1 Cor 9:25 cf. 2 Tim 2:5. b. Metaphorical. The eternal blessedness which will be given as a prize to the genuine servants of God and Christ: ho tēs dikaiosunēs stephanos, the crown (wreath) which is the reward of righteousness, 2 Tim 4:8…”. Throughout the New Testament “stephanos” does hold the idea of reward for the contest won. In our text the disciples at Smyrna are challenged to be faithful unto death—the contest was to try their faith. Only by remaining loyal unto death, when the contest is won, will the “stephanos” be obtained. In this sense the Christian life is viewed as an athletic competition, where there can be only one winner (1 Cor 9:24). On the personal level the contestants are but two: the disciple and the Devil. Which will win? Paul spoke of pressing “toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus” (Phil 3:14). Of course “the mark” is the finish line for which all Christians run. We must not look to the right or left. Nor, should we be concerned about who runs beside us (John 21:20-23). Paul’s advice to the church at Colossae is good for all who compete for eternal life, “if ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God” (Col 3:1). All athletic contests have rules, and the Christian’s race is no exception. If one strives for the crown, he or she must follow the rules. Paul tells Timothy, “And if a man also strive for masteries, yet is he not crowned, except he strive lawfully” (2 Tim 2:5). Sometimes an athlete will feel as though the rules of the game are confining, but there is comfort in knowing that the opponent must follow the same laws. Satan is also confined by the rules. Even he cannot violate the laws of God. The disciple must be sure of the regulations, so his or her striving will not be in vain. Paul wrote to Timothy of those who competed, and perhaps excelled over their opponents, but would not be “crowned” unless the regulations were followed. Jesus, spoke of those who, in the last day, will have the disappointment of disqualification—even after the finish line is crossed. Matthew records His words: 
“Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity” (Matt 7:22-23). 
The word “iniquity” is the Greek word anomia (Strong’s #G458), “illegality, i.e. violation of law ... transgression of the law, ... .” Therefore, those of whom Christ is speaking competed in the conflict for the “masteries,” but were not “crowned” because their efforts, though ardent, were not executed “lawfully.”

Stephanos,” has a more elaborate and conspicuous application than does “diadēma” (Strong’s #G4735). It contains, as its first and foremost quality, the idea of royalty; but carries, also, the imagery of the victor of an athletic contest (3:11; 4:4,10; 6:2; 9:7; 12:1; 14:14). The disciple’s life in the Kingdom of the Messiah is both: the ruling and reigning with Christ as kings and priests, and, also, the contest against our adversary the Devil.  Jesus included both aspects in His promise to the church at Laodicea. He summed it up this way: 
“To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.” (3:21) 
The idea of overcoming in the contest, and royal kingship, are both here; just as both ideas are in the word stephanos for crown.

Apostolically Spaeaking,
☩ Jerry L Hayes

If you are enjoying this commentary you would appreciate owning "The Apocalypse" from which our commentary is excerpted.



The Apocalypse, is the introduction to the biblical book of Revelation. Here Bishop Hayes also gives a verse by verse commentary of the first three chapters of the Apostle John's Revelation of Jesus Christ, covering the letters addressed to the seven churches of Asia Minor. The Bible student will thrill at the Bishop's easy evangelistic style of presenting deep and unique truths never before published. In this study a wealth of information will be shared with the disciples of Christ on each verse of this great manuscript.

Own your personal copy of this enlightening work by ordering at the link provided here:https://www.amazon.com/Apocalypse-Introduction-Epistles-Seven-Churches/dp/1686423152/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Bishop+Jerry+Hayes%2C+Apocalypse&qid=1568308793&s=books&sr=1-1













Companion to "The Apocalypse" is "Letters to My Children on Apostolic Kingdom Theology."






After spending over forty years in the dispensational doctrine, and having raise my children in that theological framework, I became a convinced adherent to a "kingdom" theology that recognizes the Church as the Israel of God, and that the first century actually saw the fulfillment of most of Matthew chapter 24. "Letters to My Children on Apostolic Kingdom Theology" is a compilation of twenty four letters written to my children explaining my journey. These "Letters" provide a systematic approach to Apostolic Eschatological study of Scripture. It is sure to interest all students of Scriptures








THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT BY PURCHASING MY BOOKS FOR YOUR LIBRARY. -JLH



Thursday, April 2, 2020

Revelation 2:8-9; Commentary: To the Angel of the Church of Smyrna

2:8-9 “And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things saith the first and the last, which was dead, and is alive; 9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.”

And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write;” The name of the city may have been a contributing cause for its selection in this group of seven. The name Smyrna (same spelling in Grk) means “bitter.” Not that they were bitter in spirit, for the opposite seems to have been the case; because the Lord has no condemnation to speak in their behalf, but counter-wise, speaks of their riches. The bitterness indicated by the word “Smyrna” was a characteristic of their daily existence. 

“These things saith the first and the last, which was dead, and is alive;” See the commentary on 1:17. Same as “Alpha and Omega.” There can be but One such individual. This is the self description of Christ.

I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) ...” The Saints were producing good works in the face of “tribulation, and poverty.” We may be certain that it would have been difficult to tell a Christian in Smyrna (during the last half of the first century) that they were not participants in the “great tribulation” spoken of by Christ during His Olivet Discourse (Matt 24:21). We are not told anything about the origin of this church, but we may assume that it was a mission from the church at Ephesus. We do know, however, that by the time Ignatius (first decade of second century) wrote his two letters to Smyrna, the church was well established with the bishop Polycarp, its elders, and deacons. While on his way to be martyred at Rome, Ignatius, bishop of Antioch in Syria, stopped in Smyrna for a period of time. While there, the church leaders came to him offering encouragement, and, also, to hear words from him. From Smyrna, Ignatius wrote five epistles to various churches, including one to Rome. From Smyrna Ignatius traveled to Troas; and from that city he wrote two epistles back to Smyrna, one to the church and the other to the bishop—Polycarp. About 40 years later Bishop Polycarp would be martyred in his city of “bitterness.”

The Lord spoke of the obvious—their poverty, and another characteristic, not so obvious—their wealth. The Saints were economically challenged, but were rich in faith. The world judges one’s success by the magnitude of material gain. God judges success by one’s magnanimity—in this the Christians at Smyrna were not surpassed.

“... blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not.”  Making the “bitterness” of life sharper was the “blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not.” These Jews (so-called) were false, not because they lacked racially, but because their lack of faith disqualify them from the name—“Jew.” The apostle Paul addresses this point when he writes to the church at Rome and says,
“For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: 29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.” (Rom 2:28-29)

and

“... For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.” (Rom 9:6-8)

What the Lord was intimating was simply this, a true son of Abraham would have, and indeed had, received his Messiah. While many rejected their Messiah, many accepted Him. These, the Apostle calls the “remnant according to the election of grace” (Ro 11:5). We have heard, and read, of the rejection of Christ by the “priests” of the Jewish religion; but more should be heard and written concerning that “great company of the priests” (who) “were obedient to the faith” (Acts 6:7). The “true” Jews walked in faith. The Jewish ruler, Nicodemus, sought Christ out, and was told that both he and his nation were to be born again (John ch 3). To this end, Paul explained in the 11th chapter of Romans that the true Israel, represented by the Olive tree, was indeed reborn, and the false Jews were cut out of the tree. Therefore, those in Smyrna who profess to be Jews were impostors. True Judaism had been born again; the rosebud of the Sinaitic covenant had bloomed into the New Covenant of Calvary (see Jer 31:31ff). 

Smyrna and Philadelphia are sister churches in more ways than one. There is that point of neither drawing disapproval from Christ, then another point in common is the false Jews, who “are the synagogue of Satan” (see 3:9).

“…but are the synagogue of Satan.” The Jewish house of worship was called the “synagogue of Satan” by Jesus for at least two reasons: 
First, they had chosen the side of Satan against God, in killing the Savior and persecuting His church. When Paul was commending the Thessalonians for their steadfastness in the face of persecution, he drew a parallel between them and the churches of Judea that had suffered at the hands of the Jews, 
“Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: 16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.” (1 Thess 2:15-16)

Secondly, the Jews’ house of worship was called the “synagogue of Satan” because the name “Satan” (Grk: Satanas, Strong’s #G4567) means “accuser.” Notice that he is so portrayed,
“And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. 10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.” (12:9-10)

It is as though the Jews, who rejected Christ and were “broken off” from the Olive tree (Rom ch 11), were taken over by the spirit of the accuser (Satanas) for they, in truth, became the primary “accusers” of the Christians; thus, “the synagogue of the accuser (Satan).”

In Smyrna, the situation became “bitter” when the Christians lost the protection of the Jewish synagogue. Smyrna’s great claim to fame was her loyalty to Rome. Because of that affinity, the city was keen on emperor worship. This required every citizen to make sacrifice to the Emperor. (As we have already seen, a temple to Emperor Tiberius was built as early as 23 A.D.). However, by Roman law the Jews were exempt from this requirement. As long as the Christians were seen as a Jewish sect this privilege was extended to them as well. But early in the life of the Church the synagogue rejected the Nazarenes, and shoved them before the eyes of the authorities as “Christians” (see Acts 11:26), and therefore liable to offer sacrifice to Caesar. 

Since making, or not making, the sacrifice was seen as a test of one’s loyalty to the government, it had a great impact upon one’s economical standing in the community. No doubt, the Christians’ refusal to become involved in the cult of Roma, or Emperor Worship, was the main cause of their poverty.

It was the Jews of Smyrna who filled the seats of the arena on the Sabbath to witness the burning of Bishop Polycarp (156 A.D.). Now, it is important to notice that the day of the week for Polycarp’s martyrdom was the Sabbath (Saturday), as we have already said, but the arena was filled with Jews. What must have they been thinking!? When the bishop refused to sacrifice or offer obeisance to the divinity of Caesar, the sentence of death by burning was given. The false Jews, who were of the “synagogue of Satan,” were so enraged against their enemy, that, although the law of Moses forbid any to light a fire on the Sabbath, these impostors broke up the very seats, upon which they sat, to fuel the fire of Polycarp’s martyrdom. The bishop was at least 86 years of age, and was the 12th martyr in Smyrna (This account must only include those officially sentenced and killed by the government.).
The Burning of Bishop Polycarp of Smyrna

A member of the Smyrna church wrote an eyewitness account of the martyrdom of Polycarp, and sent it to the church at Philomelium. This written account was the first detailed record of a Christian martyrdom, since Luke had written of the stoning of Steven (see Acts 7:54-8:3).

Apostolically Speaking,
☩ Jerry L Hayes

If you are enjoying this commentary you would appreciate owning "The Apocalypse" from which our commentary is excerpted.



The Apocalypse, is the introduction to the biblical book of Revelation. Here Bishop Hayes also gives a verse by verse commentary of the first three chapters of the Apostle John's Revelation of Jesus Christ, covering the letters addressed to the seven churches of Asia Minor. The Bible student will thrill at the Bishop's easy evangelistic style of presenting deep and unique truths never before published. In this study a wealth of information will be shared with the disciples of Christ on each verse of this great manuscript.

Own your personal copy of this enlightening work by ordering at the link provided here:https://www.amazon.com/Apocalypse-Introduction-Epistles-Seven-Churches/dp/1686423152/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Bishop+Jerry+Hayes%2C+Apocalypse&qid=1568308793&s=books&sr=1-1













Companion to "The Apocalypse" is "Letters to My Children on Apostolic Kingdom Theology."






After spending over forty years in the dispensational doctrine, and having raise my children in that theological framework, I became a convinced adherent to a "kingdom" theology that recognizes the Church as the Israel of God, and that the first century actually saw the fulfillment of most of Matthew chapter 24. "Letters to My Children on Apostolic Kingdom Theology" is a compilation of twenty four letters written to my children explaining my journey. These "Letters" provide a systematic approach to Apostolic Eschatological study of Scripture. It is sure to interest all students of Scriptures








THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT BY PURCHASING MY BOOKS FOR YOUR LIBRARY. -JLH



Wednesday, April 1, 2020

Revelation 2:7; Commentary,

2:7  He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God.

The Lord has addressed the angels of the churches and the congregations as a corporate body, but at the last—and the same is true with each of the seven churches—it comes down to the individual.

“He that hath an ear, let him hear, ... to him that overcometh ...” The awesomeness of Christ can never be told: While His purpose (and the Mystery of God) is concerned with the big picture, He remains focused on the individual disciple. (See the same at Smyrna v11; Pergamos, v17; Thyatira, v29; Sardis, 3:6; Philadelphia, 3:13; and Laodicea, 3:22.)

This saying, that is repeated to each church as a salutation (“He that hath an ear, let him hear ...”), is also employed by Jesus in His Kingdom teachings. It is noticed that in response to the inquiry made by the disciples of John the Baptist as to whether or not He was the Messiah, Jesus said, “Go and shew John again those things which ye do hear and see” (Mt 11:4). Upon their departure, Jesus informs the multitude that the Baptist was the fulfilled prophecy of Elijah’s coming (Mal 4:5). Then He says “He that hath ears to hear, let him hear” (Matt 11:15). Again, at the end of the first of seven kingdom parables found in Matthew’s gospel, chapter thirteen (the parable of the sower) Jesus says, “Who hath ears to hear, let him hear” (Matt 13:9). And once more at the close of the parable of the Wheat and Tares (Matt 13:43) He says, “Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.”

The mysteries of the Kingdom were not for everyone to understand. Only those who “hath ears to hear.” For this reason Jesus taught in parables (Matt 13:10-11). Jesus spoke often on the issue of hearing. We often hear the saying concerning someone gifted on some musical instrument, that “He has an ear for music.” So, too, grasping the things of the Kingdom requires a certain ear. Christ said, at one point, “My sheep hear my voice,” and also, “And a stranger will they not follow” (John 10:3, 5, 27). It takes a certain ear to be a disciple, to follow the voice of the shepherd. To pick His voice out of the din of voices, in the world that surrounds us, takes an ear for God. “He who hath an ear, let him hear ... .” 
The Sheep of many shepherds are pastured together in a field. One lone shepherd approaches and calls out. It is not so much his word, as it is his voice, that causes the reaction. Throughout the mixed flock, heads jump to attention, and, here and there, sheep look in the direction of the voice. Most, however, continue to graze, paying the intruder no attention. They had not heard. It was not their shepherd’s voice. As the lone shepherd moves across the periphery of the flock, the scattered sheep move through the multitude of the unaffected, unmoved, grazers. Coming from a hundred different points of the field, a hundred different sheep, with ears to hear, are verging on one point—the voice of their shepherd. The others did not notice their leaving.

Dear disciple, we may ponder the wonder of it all. Why you, out of a large family? Why only certain ones from the workplace? Why only those congregations out of such a large city? Why this nation, or that nation, out of the peoples of the earth? How can a call so irresistible to some, go virtually unnoticed by others? It is the ear! One must have an ear for the Shepherd.

“… let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.” We had spoken about the voice of the Shepherd. Of course, it is the voice of Jesus of whom we speak. The One who “was dead,” but is “alive for evermore.” (1:18). And if that is not clear enough, the “voice” that spoke, said John (1:12), names Himself in 22:16, when He says, “I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches.” Knowing that the One speaking these things is clearly Jesus Christ is a powerful revelation (i.e. an unveiling of Jesus). He Himself, says, “Hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.” The unveiling is this: Jesus, the “Voice” which is speaking, is the Holy Spirit. Nowhere does the Bible demonstrate that Jesus and the Holy Spirit are two separate entities. If that were true there would be one Spirit of Jesus, and another Spirit of the Holy Spirit. Once you add the Spirit of the Father there would be three Spirits, each being God. This would make three Gods, no matter the theological jargon one would use to evade the obvious. Paul, writing to the Ephesians, said that there is but “One Spirit, ...one Lord, one faith, and one baptism.” (Eph 4:4-5). The same writer, when corresponding with the church at Colosse wrote, “For in him” (Jesus Christ) “dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily” (Col 2:9). John, himself, recorded the oneness of Jesus with the Holy Spirit in his gospel. E.g. When speaking of the comforter (Holy Spirit) in John chapter fourteen, the evangelist records Jesus’ words, “I will not leave you comfortless; I will come to you” (John 14:18). Verse 26 identifies the Comforter as the Holy Spirit,  “But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, ...”

Jesus said, “Nevertheless, I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away; for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you” (John 16:7).  Christ had to be glorified in order to return in Spirit. Note Jesus’ words, “but ye know him;” (i.e. the Spirit of Truth) “for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you” (John 14:17).

Paul, when speaking of the mystery among the Gentiles, wrote, “Even the mystery which hath been hid from ages and from generations, but now is made manifest to his saints: To whom God would make known what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in you, the hope of glory:” (Col 1:26-27). Again, Paul, when writing of the Holy Spirit, writes to the church at Philippi,  “For I know that this shall turn to my salvation through your prayer, and the supply of the Spirit of Jesus Christ” (Phil 1:19). Further, the writer of the Epistle to the Hebrews identifies Jesus as the Holy Spirit when he writes, “How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, ...” (Heb 9:14).

“To him that overcometh…” The “supply of the Spirt of Jesus Christ” (Phil 1:19), which brings revelation to John, also helps believers overcome. The Spirit speaks, here, “To him that overcometh,” tōi nikōnti, literally, to the one overcoming.” The verb is present tense, therefore, shows continued action, i.e. goes on overcoming.”  The image is that of a victor. The idea is one of a Christian who holds fast his faith against the forces of temptation and persecution, even unto death. This challenge to overcome (lit. continue to overcome) is given to each Church (see, here, vv11, 17, 26; 3:5, 12, 21), and is summed up in the words of the Almighty, in 21:7, “He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.” 

“... will I give to eat from the tree of life, ...” The tree of life will be more closely examined at 22:2. It is most likely mentioned here, in the sense of reward to the victor, to illustrate full fellowship restored, i.e. the union, of God with man, is to be enjoyed in the paradise of God—the eternal state. 

“... which is in the midst of the paradise of God.” The reward, for the person who overcomes unto the end, is access to the tree of life, “which is in the midst of the paradise of God.” The Septuagint (the Grk translation of the Old Testament) uses this word “paradise” to insinuate a garden (Gen 2:8-10) or forest (Neh 2:8); but in the New Testament (used only here and in Luke 23:43) it refers to a place of bliss and rest between death and the resurrection. Before the resurrection of Jesus, paradise was located in the underworld as is demonstrated in the story of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19-31). Also, verifying this point are the words of Jesus to the thief crucified with Him, “Today shalt thou be with me in paradise (Luke 23:43); we know that Jesus and the thief were in paradise that day, but three days later Jesus tells Mary, “Touch me not for I have not yet ascended to my Father” (John 20:17). Jesus and the thief were in paradise days before He ascended to heaven. At Christ’s ascension paradise was liberated (1 Pet 3:18-19 cf. Eph 4:8-10) and relocated to heaven with Christ Jesus, which is demonstrated by Paul’s testimony of the man, he “knew,” who was “caught up to the third heaven ... up into paradise” (2 Cor 12:2-4). Therefore, after the ascension of Christ, paradise is found in the third heaven, i.e. the heaven of the throne of God. (The word “paradeisos” is of Persian origin and means a pleasure garden.)

The characteristics of Ephesus continue to be seen in modern times. Ephesus was a missions minded church. It was the church of the apostles who had heard the words of Jesus with their own ears, “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” (make disciples of all nations), “baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost;” (Matt 28:19). From Ephesus the word of God spread over all Asia “so that all they which dwelt in Asia heard the word of the Lord Jesus, both Jews and Greeks” (Acts 19:10). Those who dedicate their lives to spreading the Gospel of Christ to the world, while contending for “the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints” (Jude v3 NKJV), are truly of the Ephesians.

Apostolically Speaking
☩ Jerry L Hayes


If you are enjoying this commentary you would appreciate owning "The Apocalypse" from which our commentary is excerpted.




The Apocalypse, is the introduction to the biblical book of Revelation. Here Bishop Hayes also gives a verse by verse commentary of the first three chapters of the Apostle John's Revelation of Jesus Christ, covering the letters addressed to the seven churches of Asia Minor. The Bible student will thrill at the Bishop's easy evangelistic style of presenting deep and unique truths never before published. In this study a wealth of information will be shared with the disciples of Christ on each verse of this great manuscript.

Own your personal copy of this enlightening work by ordering at the link provided here:https://www.amazon.com/Apocalypse-Introduction-Epistles-Seven-Churches/dp/1686423152/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Bishop+Jerry+Hayes%2C+Apocalypse&qid=1568308793&s=books&sr=1-1













Companion to "The Apocalypse" is "Letters to My Children on Apostolic Kingdom Theology."






After spending over forty years in the dispensational doctrine, and having raise my children in that theological framework, I became a convinced adherent to a "kingdom" theology that recognizes the Church as the Israel of God, and that the first century actually saw the fulfillment of most of Matthew chapter 24. "Letters to My Children on Apostolic Kingdom Theology" is a compilation of twenty four letters written to my children explaining my journey. These "Letters" provide a systematic approach to Apostolic Eschatological study of Scripture. It is sure to interest all students of Scriptures








THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT BY PURCHASING MY BOOKS FOR YOUR LIBRARY. -JLH